Erich: The other day I made reference to Descartes, the French philosopher. His famous dictum was, “I think, therefore I am.”
When I first heard that I said, "It sounds good to me. I don't know. That guy seems pretty smart." But then, the more I got into this, the more it seemed like I could argue his case in a way that I would agree with, but basically I think he got it backwards.
It's not, "I think, therefore I am."
It's the other way around. “I am” comes first...
Freeform Playlist from class:
- no Freeform today so No playlist today
Members get all Venice Classes delivered right to your Desktop, Pad, Smartphone or iPod just click button to subscribe. All Podcastes are now full class since Jan 2014. There is NOW only 1 podcast even though tutorial mentions 2 different podcasts
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
 
|
thoughtfully and well said
I think was the thought that was the originator, and the substance was the result…hmmm
Awesome!
I also would like to consider, “I am a thought, therefore I think I am”. 🙂
How about “I do yoga, therefore I am”?